16GB VRAM

RTX 4060 Ti 16G — what LLMs can it run?

63 of 110 indexed models fit comfortably in 16GB at 4K context, each at the highest-quality quant that still leaves headroom.

The short answer for RTX 4060 Ti 16G

16 GB, 288 GB/s GDDR6. 63 of 110 models in this index fit comfortably at 4K context; 74 load at all.

Biggest that fits
Mistral Small 24B Instruct — 13.2 GB at AWQ INT4 — 2.8 GB spare at 4K, so longer context comes out of a thin margin.
Room to grow
Stable LM 2 12B Chat — 8.3 GB at Q4_K_M — under 60% of the card, which leaves 7.7 GB for a long context window or a second process.
Speed ceiling
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct at Q4_K_M reads 4.6 GB of weights per token, so 288 GB/s puts a hard ceiling near 62 tok/s. That is arithmetic on two published numbers, not a benchmark — real throughput lands below it. No run on this card has been measured here, so there is nothing to compare the ceiling against.
The wall you will hit
Bandwidth, not capacity. The models on this page fit, but at 288 GB/s this card reads the whole weight set once per generated token — a 960 GB/s RTX 5080 holds exactly the same 16 GB and moves those bytes 3.3× faster. Expect the same quant to generate proportionally slower here.
Best local LLM for 16GB

32B · 6

RTX 4060 Ti 16G — what LLMs can it run? — 32B
ModelQuantEst. VRAMHeadroomtok/s
Mistral Small 24B Instruct24BAWQ INT413.23 GB+2.8 GB≤25Ceiling
Devstral Small 1.1 24B24BAWQ INT413.02 GB+3 GB≤26Ceiling
Magistral Small 1.2 24B24BAWQ INT413.02 GB+3 GB≤26Ceiling
Codestral 22B22BAWQ INT412.56 GB+3.4 GB≤27Ceiling
ERNIE 4.5 21B-A3B21B-A3BQ4_K_M14.05 GB+1.9 GB≤167Ceiling
GPT-OSS 20B21B MoEMXFP412.76 GB+3.2 GB≤146Ceiling

14B · 18

RTX 4060 Ti 16G — what LLMs can it run? — 14B
ModelQuantEst. VRAMHeadroomtok/s
InternLM2 20B Chat20BQ4_K_M13.43 GB+2.6 GB20–27Derived
DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Lite Instruct16B-A2.4BQ4_K_M10.08 GB+5.9 GB≤208Ceiling
DeepSeek-V2-Lite Chat16B-A2.4BQ4_K_M10.08 GB+5.9 GB≤208Ceiling
StarCoder2 15B15BQ4_K_M10.19 GB+5.8 GB27–35Derived
Qwen3 14B Instruct14BQ5_K_M11.65 GB+4.4 GB23–31Derived
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct14BQ5_K_M11.73 GB+4.3 GB23–31Derived
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B14BEXL2 4.65bpw9.75 GB+6.3 GB≤35Ceiling
Phi-4 14B14BQ5_K_M11.77 GB+4.2 GB23–31Derived
Phi-3 Medium 14B Instruct14BQ6_K12.86 GB+3.1 GB21–28Derived
Mistral Nemo 12B Instruct12BQ6_K11.14 GB+4.9 GB24–32Derived
Gemma 3 12B IT12BQ5_K_M9.84 GB+6.2 GB28–37Derived
Mellum2.1 12B-A2.5B Thinking12B-A2.5BQ8_013.6 GB+2.4 GB≤114Ceiling
Stable LM 2 12B Chat12BQ4_K_M8.35 GB+7.7 GB33–44Derived
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct11BQ8_012.9 GB+3.1 GB21–27Derived
Solar 10.7B Instruct11BQ4_K_M7.6 GB+8.4 GB37–49Derived
Falcon 3 10B Instruct10BQ4_K_M7.28 GB+8.7 GB38–51Derived
Gemma 2 9B Instruct9BQ8_011.7 GB+4.3 GB25–33Derived
Qwen3.5 9B9BQ8_010.37 GB+5.6 GB25–33Derived

7B · 25

RTX 4060 Ti 16G — what LLMs can it run? — 7B
ModelQuantEst. VRAMHeadroomtok/s
GLM-4-9B-Chat9BQ8_010.16 GB+5.8 GB25–33Derived
Qwen3-VL 8B Instruct8BQ8_010.39 GB+5.6 GB26–34Derived
Granite 4.2 8B8BQ8_010.45 GB+5.6 GB26–34Derived
Ministral 3 8B Instruct8BQ8_010.02 GB+6 GB27–35Derived
Qwen2-VL 7B Instruct7BQ4_K_M5.49 GB+10.5 GB48–64Derived
Granite 3.1 8B Instruct8BQ4_K_M5.88 GB+10.1 GB49–64Derived
Qwen3 8B Instruct8BQ6_K7.64 GB+8.4 GB36–48Derived
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct8BQ8_09.47 GB+6.5 GB28–38Derived
Nous Hermes 3 Llama 3.1 8B8BEXL2 4.65bpw5.43 GB+10.6 GB≤65Ceiling
Aya 23 8B8BQ4_K_M5.64 GB+10.4 GB50–66Derived
OpenChat 3.6 8B8BEXL2 4.65bpw5.43 GB+10.6 GB≤65Ceiling
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-8B8BQ5_K_M6.51 GB+9.5 GB42–56Derived
InternLM2 7B Chat7BQ4_K_M5.45 GB+10.6 GB52–68Derived
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct7BQ6_K6.77 GB+9.2 GB39–51Derived
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct7BEXL2 4.65bpw4.87 GB+11.1 GB≤68Ceiling
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B7BEXL2 4.65bpw4.87 GB+11.1 GB≤68Ceiling
Gemma 4 E4B ITE4BQ8_08.46 GB+7.5 GB30–40Derived
OLMo 2 7B Instruct7BQ8_010.3 GB+5.7 GB31–41Derived
OLMo 3 7B Instruct7BQ8_010.3 GB+5.7 GB31–41Derived
WizardLM-2 7B7BQ4_K_M5.14 GB+10.9 GB55–73Derived
Mistral 7B Instruct v0.37BQ6_K6.75 GB+9.3 GB41–54Derived
Zephyr 7B Beta7BQ6_K6.75 GB+9.3 GB41–54Derived
Gemma 4 E2B ITE2BQ8_05.2 GB+10.8 GB≤61Ceiling
Qwen3.5 4B4BQ8_04.97 GB+11 GB≤66Ceiling
Gemma 3 4B IT4BQ8_05.05 GB+11 GB≤66Ceiling

≤3B · 14

RTX 4060 Ti 16G — what LLMs can it run? — ≤3B
ModelQuantEst. VRAMHeadroomtok/s
Qwen3 4B Instruct4BQ6_K4.05 GB+12 GB≤92Ceiling
Phi-4 Mini Instruct3.8BQ8_04.81 GB+11.2 GB≤74Ceiling
Phi-3.5 Mini Instruct3.8BQ8_05.89 GB+10.1 GB≤75Ceiling
Granite 4.2 3B3BQ8_04.41 GB+11.6 GB≤78Ceiling
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct3BQ8_04.05 GB+12 GB≤89Ceiling
Qwen2.5 3B Instruct3BQ8_03.59 GB+12.4 GB≤92Ceiling
SmolLM3 3B3BQ8_03.73 GB+12.3 GB≤93Ceiling
Gemma 2 2B Instruct2BQ8_03.34 GB+12.7 GB≤110Ceiling
Qwen3.5 2B2BQ8_02.23 GB+13.8 GB≤145Ceiling
Qwen3 1.7B Instruct1.7BQ8_02.39 GB+13.6 GB≤166Ceiling
Qwen2.5 1.5B Instruct1.5BQ8_01.83 GB+14.2 GB≤186Ceiling
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct1BQ8_01.51 GB+14.5 GB≤230Ceiling
Qwen3.5 0.8B0.8BQ8_00.94 GB+15.1 GB≤356Ceiling
Qwen2.5 0.5B Instruct0.5BQ8_00.6 GB+15.4 GB≤588Ceiling

How this list is built

Each row is the lowest-perplexity-loss quant of that model whose estimated total — weights plus KV cache at 4K context plus activation buffer — uses at most 88% of the card. That is the calculator's "green" threshold, so every row here has real headroom rather than only just fitting. Raise the context length and the list shortens; the calculator lets you check any combination directly. The speed column is this card: a measured run, a range scaled from this card's own Llama 2 7B benchmark, or a bandwidth ceiling. A figure that only exists for the RTX 4090 is labelled as that card.

A further 11 models load but with no headroom to spare (up to 105% of VRAM) — the Quant Hub’s GPU chips count those too, which is why its number is higher.

Measured on this card

No benchmark runs in this index were recorded on a RTX 4060 Ti 16G. Every figure on this page is calculated from the model architecture and the quant level — treat them as estimates, not measurements.

Cards with the same budget

What fits is decided by memory, so every 16GB card of this type returns the same list. These pages are not different answers — they differ in throughput, which this index does not measure per card.

The same 16GB in system memory is a different machine — everything on this page fits there, at a speed set by your DIMMs rather than a graphics bus: 16 GB RAM (CPU)

Same list, different speed — play one sentence on both cards: RTX 4060 Ti 16G vs RTX 5080 (Qwen3 14B Instruct) · RTX 4060 Ti 16G vs RTX 5070 Ti (Qwen3 14B Instruct) · RTX 4060 Ti 16G vs RTX 5060 Ti 16G (Qwen3 14B Instruct)

Setup guides for this card

Step-by-step guides written for the RTX 4060 Ti 16G's runtime or memory size, with the commands and the checks that prove the model is running on the card.

Stepping up

A RTX 4090 (24GB) fits 21 more of the indexed models than this card. RTX 4090 →

Before buying, hear the speed difference on a model both cards hold: RTX 4060 Ti 16G vs RTX 4090 (Qwen3 14B Instruct) →

Common questions

What is the best local LLM for an RTX 4060 Ti 16G?

For everyday use, Stable LM 2 12B Chat at Q4_K_M — about 8.3 GB of the card's 16 GB at 4K context, leaving 7.7 GB for a longer window. If you want the largest thing that will load, that is Mistral Small 24B Instruct at AWQ INT4 (13.2 GB, 2.8 GB spare). "Best" here means best fit for the memory budget — this index does not run task benchmarks, so it cannot tell you which model is smarter.

Can an RTX 4060 Ti 16G run Gemma 4 26B-A4B IT?

Only just. Its smallest build here, Q4_K_M, needs about 16.4 GB against 16.0 GB usable — that loads with nothing else running, with no margin for a longer context window. It is not on the list above, which requires a model to stay inside 88% of usable capacity.

How many tokens per second does an RTX 4060 Ti 16G do on an 8B model at Q4?

This index has no measured run on this card, so it does not publish a figure. What can be stated from specifications: generating a token requires reading every weight once, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct at Q4_K_M is 4.6 GB of weights, and this card moves 288 GB/s — a ceiling near 62 tok/s. Batch size, context length, the runtime and how much of the model sits in cache all take you below it.

RTX 4060 Ti 16G or RTX 5080 for local LLMs?

They hold the same models: 16 GB against 16 GB fits 63 and 63 of 110 respectively at 4K. The difference is throughput — 288 GB/s against 960 GB/s, a 3.3× gap in how fast the weights can be read, which is what token generation is bound by. The RTX 5080 generates faster on any model both can hold.

63 of 110 indexed models fit comfortably in 16GB at 4K context, each at the highest-quality quant that still leaves headroom.

This page's figures change when the model or the runtime does.Last updated 2026-10-18 RSS → /feed.xml