Codestral 22B

Running Codestral 22B locally

At Q4_K_M and 4K of context, Codestral 22B needs about 15.0 GB — 12.8 GB of weights, 0.88 GB of KV cache and a 1.4 GB activation buffer. The smallest card in this index that clears that comfortably is the Radeon RX 7900 XT at 20 GB, and 31 of the 63 cards here do. These are calculated figures, not measurements: the estimate stops counting a card as comfortable at 88% of its VRAM, which is roughly the room a desktop session needs.

What longer context costs

Going from 4K to 32K adds about 6.12 GB, taking the total to 21.8 GB. Weights do not move with context — only the KV cache does, and it grows linearly, so this is the number to watch when planning for long documents. The model's native window is 32K; holding all of it at Q4_K_M would need about 22 GB.

Which build to download

This index tracks 2 formats for it — GGUF, AWQ — across 2 levels. Q4_K_M carries the lowest published perplexity loss at 3.0%. The fastest level measured here is AWQ INT4 at 72 tok/s on an RTX 4090, batch 1. GGUF runs on llama.cpp and Ollama across NVIDIA, AMD and Apple silicon; AWQ and GPTQ target vLLM on CUDA and ROCm; EXL2 is ExLlamaV2 and CUDA only.

Common questions

How much VRAM does Codestral 22B need?

About 15.0 GB at Q4_K_M with 4K of context and batch 1, rising to roughly 21.8 GB at 32K. That figure is weights plus KV cache plus a 10% activation buffer, calculated from the model's architecture rather than measured on a card.

Will Codestral 22B run on a 20GB GPU?

Yes — at Q4_K_M and 4K context it needs about 15.0 GB, which leaves 5.0 GB spare on a Radeon RX 7900 XT. That is the smallest card in this index that clears it comfortably; 31 of 63 do.

Which quantization of Codestral 22B should I use?

Q4_K_M has the lowest published quality loss (3.0%), and Q4_K_M is the level most people run. All 2 levels in the index are Q4_K_M, AWQ INT4.