Gemma 3 12B IT

12B

Google Gemma 3

Mid-size Gemma 3 with vision. Fits 16GB at Q4; excellent multilingual chat.

Consumer GPUMac / Apple Silicon

131K

Max Context

3

Quant Variants

GGUF Q5_K_M

Best Quality

+1.3%

Perplexity rise (best build)

Quantization Variants

Per-quant VRAM, quality loss, and inference speed on RTX 4090

Measured = run on this site · Estimated = not run here: calculated, or a figure this site has not verified · Community = public reports

FormatLevelBPWVRAMPPL LossSpeedSourceActions
GGUFQ4_K_M4.858.5 GB2.9%105 tok/sEstimated
CalcHF
GGUFQ5_K_M5.689.8 GB1.3%92 tok/sEstimated
CalcHF
AWQINT447.2 GB3.9%128 tok/sEstimated
CalcHF

Which file each size is for

A file size is not a memory figure: the VRAM column is the calculator's total at 4K context — weights plus KV cache plus a 10% activation buffer. Units differ on purpose: file sizes are decimal GB, as Hugging Face lists them; the VRAM column is GiB (1024³ bytes) with 2% added to the weights, so 7.12 GB of file counts as about 6.8 GiB there. A vision projector (mmproj), where the repo ships one, is a separate download and is in neither number.

  • GGUF Q4_K_MSized at the calculator's generic rate for this level; no file was checked.
  • GGUF Q5_K_MSized at the calculator's generic rate for this level; no file was checked.
  • AWQ INT4Sized at the calculator's generic rate for this level; no file was checked.

Similar models

Compare with Gemma 3

Running Gemma 3 12B IT locally

At Q4_K_M and 4K of context, Gemma 3 12B IT needs about 8.5 GB — 7.0 GB of weights, 0.72 GB of KV cache and a 0.8 GB activation buffer. The smallest cards in this index that clear that comfortably are 10 GB ones — 2 of them, from the Arc B570 10G up — and 67 of the 78 cards here do. These are calculated figures, not measurements: the estimate stops counting a card as comfortable at 88% of its VRAM, which is roughly the room a desktop session needs.

What longer context costs

Going from 4K to 32K adds about 1.75 GB, taking the total to 10.4 GB. That is gentler than the parameter count suggests: only 8 of 48 layers keep a KV cache that grows with context, and 40 more cap theirs at a sliding window, so the cache scales at a fraction of the usual rate. The model's native window is 128K; holding all of it at Q4_K_M would need about 17 GB.

Which build to download

This index tracks 2 formats for it — GGUF, AWQ — across 3 levels. Q5_K_M carries the lowest published perplexity loss at 1.3%. The fastest level listed is AWQ INT4 at about 128 tok/s on an RTX 4090, batch 1 — an estimate, not a run on this site's hardware. GGUF runs on llama.cpp and Ollama across NVIDIA, AMD and Apple silicon; AWQ and GPTQ target vLLM on CUDA and ROCm; EXL2 is ExLlamaV2 — CUDA only, and now archived, so local use rather than serving.

Common questions

How much VRAM does Gemma 3 12B IT need?
About 8.5 GB at Q4_K_M with 4K of context and batch 1, rising to roughly 10.4 GB at 32K. That figure is weights plus KV cache plus a 10% activation buffer, calculated from the model's architecture rather than measured on a card.
Will Gemma 3 12B IT run on a 10GB GPU?
Yes — at Q4_K_M and 4K context it needs about 8.5 GB, which leaves 1.5 GB spare on a Arc B570 10G, or on any of the other 10 GB cards here (2 in all). That is the smallest size in this index that clears it comfortably; 67 of 78 do.
Which quantization of Gemma 3 12B IT should I use?
Q5_K_M has the lowest published quality loss (1.3%), and Q4_K_M is the level most people run. All 3 levels in the index are Q4_K_M, Q5_K_M, AWQ INT4.

Where this model fits

Sized at Q4_K_M with a 4K context window, smallest card first. Comfortable means the estimate uses at most 88% of the memory.

Ships in
GGUFAWQ
Compared here
GGUF vs AWQ

This page's figures change when the model or the runtime does.Last updated 2026-11-11 RSS → /feed.xml