Gemma 3 27B IT

27B

Google Gemma 3

Gemma 3 large instruct with long context and multimodal support. Q4 ~16GB — dual-GPU or 24GB card with short ctx.

⬇ 341.5K HF downloads♥ 2061 likesgoogle/gemma-3-27b-it· stats from 10/28/2026
Consumer GPUPro GPU

131K

Max Context

3

Quant Variants

GGUF Q4_K_M

Best Quality

+2.8%

Perplexity rise (best build)

Quantization Variants

Per-quant VRAM, quality loss, and inference speed on RTX 4090

Measured = run on this site · Estimated = not run here: calculated, or a figure this site has not verified · Community = public reports

FormatLevelBPWVRAMPPL LossSpeedSourceActions
GGUFQ4_K_M4.8518.4 GB2.8%48 tok/sCommunity
CalcHF
GGUFQ3_K_M3.8714.9 GB5.5%55 tok/sEstimated
CalcHF
AWQINT4415.3 GB3.8%62 tok/sEstimated
CalcHF

Which file each size is for

A file size is not a memory figure: the VRAM column is the calculator's total at 4K context — weights plus KV cache plus a 10% activation buffer. Units differ on purpose: file sizes are decimal GB, as Hugging Face lists them; the VRAM column is GiB (1024³ bytes) with 2% added to the weights, so 7.12 GB of file counts as about 6.8 GiB there. A vision projector (mmproj), where the repo ships one, is a separate download and is in neither number.

  • GGUF Q4_K_MSized at the calculator's generic rate for this level; no file was checked.
  • GGUF Q3_K_MSized at the calculator's generic rate for this level; no file was checked.
  • AWQ INT4Sized at the calculator's generic rate for this level; no file was checked.

Similar models

Compare with Gemma 3
4B

Gemma 3 4B IT

Google Gemma 3

Consumer GPUMac / Apple Silicon
Q4_K_M3.0 GB+3.2%perplexity rise

Google Gemma 3 multimodal 4B. 128K context; strong vision + text on 8GB cards.

12B

Gemma 3 12B IT

Google Gemma 3

Consumer GPUMac / Apple Silicon
Q4_K_M8.5 GB+2.9%perplexity rise

Mid-size Gemma 3 with vision. Fits 16GB at Q4; excellent multilingual chat.

30B-A3B

Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B Instruct

Alibaba Qwen3-VL

Consumer GPUPro GPU
Q4_K_M19.7 GB+2.6%perplexity rise

Multimodal MoE with only ~3B active parameters, so it stays responsive on Apple unified memory and survives CPU offload far better than a dense 30B. Q4 ~19GB — a 24GB card holds it outright.

26B-A4B

Gemma 4 26B-A4B IT

Google Gemma 4

Consumer GPUPro GPU
Q4_K_M18.2 GB—perplexity rise

Google's Gemma 4 mixture-of-experts model: about 25B parameters in the text model, roughly 4B active per token, a 256K window and image input. Only 5 of its 30 layers keep a cache that grows with context, and those use fewer, wider heads, so the cache stays small — about 0.9 GB at 32K and 5.3 GB at the full 256K. At Q4_K_M that is about 18.8 GB at 32K: comfortable on a 24 GB card, which can still load the whole window (tight, about 23.6 GB). A 16 GB card cannot hold it, since the Q4_K_M file alone is 17.0 GB. The vision encoder is a separate 1.2 GB file on top. Sizes come from bartowski's GGUF files, whose Q4_K_M works out at 5.40 bits per weight, well above the generic 4-bit rate; Unsloth's UD-Q4_K_M is a different file, 0.09 GB smaller. No per-level quality loss has been published.

Running Gemma 3 27B IT locally

At Q4_K_M and 4K of context, Gemma 3 27B IT needs about 18.4 GB — 15.8 GB of weights, 0.92 GB of KV cache and a 1.7 GB activation buffer. The smallest cards in this index that clear that comfortably are 24 GB ones — 4 of them, from the RTX 3090 up — and 31 of the 78 cards here do. These are calculated figures, not measurements: the estimate stops counting a card as comfortable at 88% of its VRAM, which is roughly the room a desktop session needs.

What longer context costs

Going from 4K to 32K adds about 2.19 GB, taking the total to 20.8 GB. That is gentler than the parameter count suggests: only 10 of 62 layers keep a KV cache that grows with context, and 52 more cap theirs at a sliding window, so the cache scales at a fraction of the usual rate. The model's native window is 128K; holding all of it at Q4_K_M would need about 29 GB.

Which build to download

This index tracks 2 formats for it — GGUF, AWQ — across 3 levels. Q4_K_M carries the lowest published perplexity loss at 2.8%. The fastest level listed is AWQ INT4 at about 62 tok/s on an RTX 4090, batch 1 — an estimate, not a run on this site's hardware. GGUF runs on llama.cpp and Ollama across NVIDIA, AMD and Apple silicon; AWQ and GPTQ target vLLM on CUDA and ROCm; EXL2 is ExLlamaV2 — CUDA only, and now archived, so local use rather than serving.

Common questions

How much VRAM does Gemma 3 27B IT need?
About 18.4 GB at Q4_K_M with 4K of context and batch 1, rising to roughly 20.8 GB at 32K. That figure is weights plus KV cache plus a 10% activation buffer, calculated from the model's architecture rather than measured on a card.
Will Gemma 3 27B IT run on a 24GB GPU?
Yes — at Q4_K_M and 4K context it needs about 18.4 GB, which leaves 5.6 GB spare on a RTX 3090, or on any of the other 24 GB cards here (4 in all). That is the smallest size in this index that clears it comfortably; 31 of 78 do.
Which quantization of Gemma 3 27B IT should I use?
Q4_K_M has the lowest published quality loss (2.8%), and Q4_K_M is the level most people run. All 3 levels in the index are Q4_K_M, Q3_K_M, AWQ INT4.

Where this model fits

Sized at Q4_K_M with a 4K context window, smallest card first. Comfortable means the estimate uses at most 88% of the memory.

Ships in
GGUFAWQ
Compared here
GGUF vs AWQ

This page's figures change when the model or the runtime does.Last updated 2026-10-28 RSS → /feed.xml