Magistral Small 1.2 24B
24BMistral Magistral
Mistral's reasoning model on a Mistral Small 3.2 base, with reasoning wrapped in [THINK] tags. Q4 ~14GB puts explicit chain-of-thought on a 16GB card — the level below the 70B-class reasoners most guides assume.
131K
Max Context
5
Quant Variants
GGUF Q6_K
Best Quality
99.4%
Accuracy Retained
Quantization Variants
Per-quant VRAM, quality loss, and inference speed on RTX 4090
Measured = run on this site · Estimated = not run here: calculated, or a figure this site has not verified · Community = public reports
Similar models
Compare with Qwen3-VL 30B-A3BQwen3-VL 30B-A3B Instruct
Alibaba Qwen3-VL
Multimodal MoE with only ~3B active parameters, so it stays responsive on Apple unified memory and survives CPU offload far better than a dense 30B. Q4 ~19GB — a 24GB card holds it outright.
Gemma 4 26B-A4B IT
Google Gemma 4
Google's Gemma 4 mixture-of-experts model: about 25B parameters in the text model, roughly 4B active per token, a 256K window and image input. Only 5 of its 30 layers keep a cache that grows with context, and those use fewer, wider heads, so the cache stays small — about 0.9 GB at 32K and 5.3 GB at the full 256K. At Q4 that is about 17 GB at 32K: comfortable on a 24 GB card, which can still load the whole window (tight). A 16 GB card is just too small. Sizes use the calculator's generic rates — no GGUF file size could be checked, and no per-level quality loss has been published.
Gemma 4 31B IT
Google Gemma 4
Google's dense Gemma 4 flagship: about 31B parameters, a 256K window and image input. Only 10 of its 60 layers cache the full context, and those use four wide KV heads, so 128K of context adds about 11 GB of cache where a conventional 60-layer design would need about 120 GB. At Q4 it is about 21 GB at 4K — on a 24 GB card that is right at the edge of comfortable, and tight from 32K. A 32 GB card holds 32K comfortably. Sizes use the calculator's generic rates — no GGUF file size could be checked, and no per-level quality loss has been published.
Gemma 3 27B IT
Google Gemma 3
Gemma 3 large instruct with long context and multimodal support. Q4 ~16GB — dual-GPU or 24GB card with short ctx.
Running Magistral Small 1.2 24B locally
At Q4_K_M and 4K of context, Magistral Small 1.2 24B needs about 15.6 GB — 13.6 GB of weights, 0.63 GB of KV cache and a 1.4 GB activation buffer. The smallest card in this index that clears that comfortably is the Radeon RX 7900 XT at 20 GB, and 32 of the 76 cards here do. These are calculated figures, not measurements: the estimate stops counting a card as comfortable at 88% of its VRAM, which is roughly the room a desktop session needs.
What longer context costs
Going from 4K to 32K adds about 4.37 GB, taking the total to 20.4 GB. Weights do not move with context — only the KV cache does, and it grows linearly, so this is the number to watch when planning for long documents. The model's native window is 128K; holding all of it at Q4_K_M would need about 37 GB.
Which build to download
This index tracks 3 formats for it — GGUF, AWQ, EXL2 — across 5 levels. Q6_K carries the lowest published perplexity loss at 0.6%. The fastest level listed is AWQ INT4 at about 76 tok/s on an RTX 4090, batch 1 — an estimate, not a run on this site's hardware. GGUF runs on llama.cpp and Ollama across NVIDIA, AMD and Apple silicon; AWQ and GPTQ target vLLM on CUDA and ROCm; EXL2 is ExLlamaV2 — CUDA only, and now archived, so local use rather than serving.
Common questions
- How much VRAM does Magistral Small 1.2 24B need?
- About 15.6 GB at Q4_K_M with 4K of context and batch 1, rising to roughly 20.4 GB at 32K. That figure is weights plus KV cache plus a 10% activation buffer, calculated from the model's architecture rather than measured on a card.
- Will Magistral Small 1.2 24B run on a 20GB GPU?
- Yes — at Q4_K_M and 4K context it needs about 15.6 GB, which leaves 4.4 GB spare on a Radeon RX 7900 XT. That is the smallest card in this index that clears it comfortably; 32 of 76 do.
- Which quantization of Magistral Small 1.2 24B should I use?
- Q6_K has the lowest published quality loss (0.6%), and Q4_K_M is the level most people run. All 5 levels in the index are Q4_K_M, Q5_K_M, Q6_K, AWQ INT4, EXL2 4.65bpw.
Where this model fits
Sized at Q4_K_M with a 4K context window, smallest card first. Comfortable means the estimate uses at most 88% of the memory.
- Runs comfortably on
- Radeon RX 7900 XT20GB · +4.4Mac M4 24G24GB · +2.4Mac M4 Pro 24G24GB · +2.4RTX 309024GB · +8.4Radeon RX 7900 XTX24GB · +8.4
- Tight but possible
- RTX 4060 Ti 16G16GBRadeon RX 7600 XT16GBRadeon RX 9060 XT 16G16GB
- Compared here
- GGUF vs AWQGGUF vs EXL2AWQ vs EXL2
- A top pick for
- Best local LLM for 16GB
- Try it yourself
- Size it in the calculatorGenerate the run command
How to actually run this
Deployment guides for this model and this class of hardware.
This page's figures change when the model or the runtime does.Last updated 2026-10-06 RSS → /feed.xml