Granite 4.2 8B

8B

IBM Granite

IBM's dense 8B reasoning model from the Granite 4.2 family (3B, 8B, 30B), released in August under Apache 2.0. Thinking is on by default; a non-thinking and a low-effort mode are chosen through the chat template. Unlike Granite 4.0's hybrid models it is a plain transformer, so llama.cpp runs it as `granite` and every one of its 40 layers keeps a full cache: about 6.3 GB at Q4_K_M with a 4K context, 11.1 GB at 32K and 27.6 GB across the whole 128K window. That makes it an 8 GB card model at short contexts and a 16 GB one for long documents. The Q4_K_M size comes from a published GGUF file; IBM publishes no perplexity by quantization level, so no quality-loss figure is shown.

⬇ 119.1K HF downloads♥ 99 likesibm-granite/granite-4.2-8b· stats from 10/14/2026
Consumer GPUMac / Apple SiliconCPU / VPS

131K

Max Context

2

Quant Variants

GGUF Q8_0

Best Quality

—

Accuracy Retained

Quantization Variants

Per-quant VRAM, quality loss, and inference speed on RTX 4090

Measured = run on this site · Estimated = not run here: calculated, or a figure this site has not verified · Community = public reports

FormatLevelBPWVRAMPPL LossSpeedSourceActions
GGUFQ4_K_M4.876.3 GB——Estimated
CalcHF
GGUFQ8_08.510.5 GB——Estimated
CalcHF

Running Granite 4.2 8B locally

At Q4_K_M and 4K of context, Granite 4.2 8B needs about 6.3 GB — 5.1 GB of weights, 0.63 GB of KV cache and a 0.6 GB activation buffer. The smallest cards in this index that clear that comfortably are 8 GB ones — 9 of them, from the RTX 4060 up — and 76 of the 78 cards here do. These are calculated figures, not measurements: the estimate stops counting a card as comfortable at 88% of its VRAM, which is roughly the room a desktop session needs.

What longer context costs

Going from 4K to 32K adds about 4.37 GB, taking the total to 11.1 GB. Weights do not move with context — only the KV cache does, and it grows linearly, so this is the number to watch when planning for long documents. The model's native window is 128K; holding all of it at Q4_K_M would need about 28 GB.

Which build to download

This index only tracks Granite 4.2 8B in GGUF, across 2 levels (Q4_K_M, Q8_0). No per-level perplexity sweep has been published for this model, so the quality column is empty rather than estimated — within one model, more bits per weight is the only ordering the data supports. No throughput has been measured for this model on this site's hardware. GGUF runs on llama.cpp and Ollama across NVIDIA, AMD and Apple silicon; AWQ and GPTQ target vLLM on CUDA and ROCm; EXL2 is ExLlamaV2 — CUDA only, and now archived, so local use rather than serving.

Common questions

How much VRAM does Granite 4.2 8B need?
About 6.3 GB at Q4_K_M with 4K of context and batch 1, rising to roughly 11.1 GB at 32K. That figure is weights plus KV cache plus a 10% activation buffer, calculated from the model's architecture rather than measured on a card.
Will Granite 4.2 8B run on a 8GB GPU?
Yes — at Q4_K_M and 4K context it needs about 6.3 GB, which leaves 1.7 GB spare on a RTX 4060, or on any of the other 8 GB cards here (9 in all). That is the smallest size in this index that clears it comfortably; 76 of 78 do.
Which quantization of Granite 4.2 8B should I use?
No published quality comparison exists for this model, so pick by footprint: Q4_K_M is the level most people run, and a higher bits-per-weight level is more faithful. All 2 levels in the index are Q4_K_M, Q8_0.

Where this model fits

Sized at Q4_K_M with a 4K context window, smallest card first. Comfortable means the estimate uses at most 88% of the memory.

Tight but possible
Mac M1 8G8GBMac M3 8G8GB
Ships in
GGUF

This page's figures change when the model or the runtime does.Last updated 2026-10-14 RSS → /feed.xml