Llama 4 Scout 17B (16E)

109B MoE

Meta Llama 4

Meta Llama 4 Scout MoE (17B active / 109B total). Multimodal; needs ~68GB VRAM at Q4_K_M.

33.9K HF downloads164 likesunsloth/Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct-GGUF· stats from 9/23/2026
Pro GPU

10486K

Max Context

3

Quant Variants

GGUF Q4_K_M

Best Quality

97.6%

Accuracy Retained

Quantization Variants

Per-quant VRAM, quality loss, and inference speed on RTX 4090

Measured = site benchmarks · Estimated = formula · Community = public reports

FormatLevelBPWVRAMPPL LossSpeedSourceActions
GGUFQ4_K_M4.8568.0 GB2.4%22 tok/sEstimated
CalcHF
GGUFQ3_K_M3.8755.0 GB4.8%26 tok/sEstimated
CalcHF
AWQINT4458.0 GB3.2%28 tok/sEstimated
CalcHF

Similar models

Compare with Llama 4

Running Llama 4 Scout 17B (16E) locally

At Q4_K_M and 4K of context, Llama 4 Scout 17B (16E) needs about 69.9 GB — 62.8 GB of weights, 0.75 GB of KV cache and a 6.3 GB activation buffer. The smallest card in this index that clears that comfortably is the A100 80G at 80 GB, and 10 of the 63 cards here do. These are calculated figures, not measurements: the estimate stops counting a card as comfortable at 88% of its VRAM, which is roughly the room a desktop session needs.

What longer context costs

Going from 4K to 32K adds about 5.25 GB, taking the total to 75.7 GB. Weights do not move with context — only the KV cache does, and it grows linearly, so this is the number to watch when planning for long documents. The model's native window is 10240K; holding all of it at Q4_K_M would need about 2181 GB.

Which build to download

This index tracks 2 formats for it — GGUF, AWQ — across 3 levels. Q4_K_M carries the lowest published perplexity loss at 2.4%. The fastest level measured here is AWQ INT4 at 28 tok/s on an RTX 4090, batch 1. GGUF runs on llama.cpp and Ollama across NVIDIA, AMD and Apple silicon; AWQ and GPTQ target vLLM on CUDA and ROCm; EXL2 is ExLlamaV2 and CUDA only.

Common questions

How much VRAM does Llama 4 Scout 17B (16E) need?
About 69.9 GB at Q4_K_M with 4K of context and batch 1, rising to roughly 75.7 GB at 32K. That figure is weights plus KV cache plus a 10% activation buffer, calculated from the model's architecture rather than measured on a card.
Will Llama 4 Scout 17B (16E) run on a 80GB GPU?
Yes — at Q4_K_M and 4K context it needs about 69.9 GB, which leaves 10.1 GB spare on a A100 80G. That is the smallest card in this index that clears it comfortably; 10 of 63 do.
Which quantization of Llama 4 Scout 17B (16E) should I use?
Q4_K_M has the lowest published quality loss (2.4%), and Q4_K_M is the level most people run. All 3 levels in the index are Q4_K_M, Q3_K_M, AWQ INT4.

Where this model fits

Sized at Q4_K_M with a 4K context window, smallest card first. Comfortable means the estimate uses at most 88% of the memory.

Tight but possible
Mac M2 Max 96G96GB
Ships in
GGUFAWQ
Compared here
GGUF vs AWQ

This page's figures change when the model or the runtime does.Last updated 2026-09-23 RSS → /feed.xml