How much VRAM does Jamba 1.5 Mini need?

About 8.2 GB at Q4_K_M with 4K of context and batch 1, rising to roughly 12.0 GB at 32K. That figure is weights plus KV cache plus a 10% activation buffer, calculated from the model's architecture rather than measured on a card.

Will Jamba 1.5 Mini run on a 10GB GPU?

Yes — at Q4_K_M and 4K context it needs about 8.2 GB, which leaves 1.8 GB spare on a RTX 3080 10G. That is the smallest card in this index that clears it comfortably; 56 of 63 do.

Which quantization of Jamba 1.5 Mini should I use?

Q4_K_M has the lowest published quality loss (3.4%), and Q4_K_M is the level most people run. All 2 levels in the index are Q4_K_M, AWQ INT4.

Jamba 1.5 Mini

12B

AI21 Labs

⚠ Superseded · Prefer Ministral 3 8B Instruct

This index would suggest Ministral 3 8B Instruct instead today — more quant levels to choose from (2 → 3). The numbers below are still accurate; they are just for a model you probably should not start with. Compare the two →

Hybrid SSM-Transformer with 256K context. Efficient long-document QA on 16GB.

Consumer GPUMac / Apple Silicon

262K

Max Context

Quant Variants

GGUF Q4_K_M

Best Quality

96.6%

Accuracy Retained

Calculate VRAM Hugging Face Compare

Quantization Variants

Per-quant VRAM, quality loss, and inference speed on RTX 4090

Measured = site benchmarks · Estimated = formula · Community = public reports

Format	Level	BPW	VRAM	PPL Loss	Speed	Source	Actions
GGUF	Q4_K_M	4.85	8.5 GB	3.4%	95 tok/s	Estimated	Calc HF
AWQ	INT4	4	7.5 GB	4.8%	125 tok/s	Estimated	Calc HF

Similar models

Compare with Qwen2.5 14B

14B

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Alibaba Qwen2.5

Consumer GPUMac / Apple Silicon

9.2 GBmin VRAM98.6%accuracy

The sweet spot between performance and resource usage. 16GB VRAM with Q4.

12B

Mistral Nemo 12B Instruct

Mistral AI

Consumer GPUMac / Apple Silicon

7.8 GBmin VRAM99.1%accuracy

Mistral + NVIDIA collaboration. 128K context, excellent multilingual support.

Gemma 2 9B Instruct

Google Gemma 2

Consumer GPUMac / Apple Silicon

5.8 GBmin VRAM99.8%accuracy

Google's compact Gemma 2 with sliding window attention. Punches above 9B.

11B

Solar 10.7B Instruct

Upstage

Consumer GPUMac / Apple Silicon

6.5 GBmin VRAM97.0%accuracy

Depth-upscaled 10.7B punching above weight. Strong on reasoning benchmarks.

Running Jamba 1.5 Mini locally

At Q4_K_M and 4K of context, Jamba 1.5 Mini needs about 8.2 GB — 6.9 GB of weights, 0.50 GB of KV cache and a 0.7 GB activation buffer. The smallest card in this index that clears that comfortably is the RTX 3080 10G at 10 GB, and 56 of the 63 cards here do. These are calculated figures, not measurements: the estimate stops counting a card as comfortable at 88% of its VRAM, which is roughly the room a desktop session needs.

What longer context costs

Going from 4K to 32K adds about 3.50 GB, taking the total to 12.0 GB. Weights do not move with context — only the KV cache does, and it grows linearly, so this is the number to watch when planning for long documents. The model's native window is 256K; holding all of it at Q4_K_M would need about 43 GB.

Which build to download

This index tracks 2 formats for it — GGUF, AWQ — across 2 levels. Q4_K_M carries the lowest published perplexity loss at 3.4%. The fastest level measured here is AWQ INT4 at 125 tok/s on an RTX 4090, batch 1. GGUF runs on llama.cpp and Ollama across NVIDIA, AMD and Apple silicon; AWQ and GPTQ target vLLM on CUDA and ROCm; EXL2 is ExLlamaV2 and CUDA only.

Common questions

How much VRAM does Jamba 1.5 Mini need?: About 8.2 GB at Q4_K_M with 4K of context and batch 1, rising to roughly 12.0 GB at 32K. That figure is weights plus KV cache plus a 10% activation buffer, calculated from the model's architecture rather than measured on a card.
Will Jamba 1.5 Mini run on a 10GB GPU?: Yes — at Q4_K_M and 4K context it needs about 8.2 GB, which leaves 1.8 GB spare on a RTX 3080 10G. That is the smallest card in this index that clears it comfortably; 56 of 63 do.
Which quantization of Jamba 1.5 Mini should I use?: Q4_K_M has the lowest published quality loss (3.4%), and Q4_K_M is the level most people run. All 2 levels in the index are Q4_K_M, AWQ INT4.

Where this model fits

Sized at Q4_K_M with a 4K context window, smallest card first. Comfortable means the estimate uses at most 88% of the memory.

Runs comfortably on: RTX 3080 10G10GB · +1.8 RTX 507012GB · +3.9 RTX 4070 Ti12GB · +3.9 RTX 4070 Super12GB · +3.9 RTX 407012GB · +3.9
Tight but possible: RTX 5060 Ti 8G8GB RTX 50608GB RTX 4060 Ti 8G8GB
Just misses: Mac M3 8G+2.2GB over
Ships in: GGUF AWQ
Compared here: GGUF vs AWQ
Try it yourself: Size it in the calculator Generate the run command

How to actually run this

Deployment guides for this model and this class of hardware.

This page's figures change when the model or the runtime does.Last updated 2026-09-21 RSS → /feed.xml